1
Gaming / Re: Disappointments of Super Mario Bros. Wonder, and What Not to Repeat
« on: June 26, 2025, 08:15:36 pm »
Have you seen the Nintendo Direct presentation specifically about Donkey Kong: Bananza? Now THAT looks like a worthy killer app for the Switch 2! I've always liked the launch games including a Mario or Zelda game. Sure, Mario Kart World is a Mario game, and it has an open world now, with missions and stuff, but I want a real adventure, and Donkey Kong: Bananza looks it it should have been that "day one" game. Still, it's only a few weeks away.
Anyway, what I am getting at, to tie it into what this topic is about, I've seen a few posts where some think that the villain, Void Kong, is somehow King K. Rool, maybe transformed and/or magically in disguise.
I personally think that idea is ridiculous. It never crossed my mind. I think there is zero reason to suspect that, as there is no hint or rationale why that should be the case. Mario's faced other antagonists than Bowser, Link's clashed with other baddies than Ganon, and Kirby has tussled with more than just King Dedede. There isn't an army of Kremlings around, VoidCo seems like it must be a whole thing, so... no. Void Kong and K. Rool have to be separate. Why should it be bizarre that Nintendo, who have created all sorts of characters, still wants to generate more new characters?
If anything, if there are more Super Smash Bros. incoming, at the rate they're going, they're putting in more characters than they can create, so I would think they would take literally every opportunity to make new ones. I'm not saying that Void Kong, Poppy Kong, and Grumpy Kong necessarily have Smash Bros. potential... but heck, a Piranha Plant made it, so, anything's possible.
In the UNLIKELY case that Void Kong IS K. Rool or some previous character in disguise, we can all come back and laugh at me. But at this time, a few weeks before released, based on what we know, I would really bet on Void Kong being a totally new villain.
Anyway, what I am getting at, to tie it into what this topic is about, I've seen a few posts where some think that the villain, Void Kong, is somehow King K. Rool, maybe transformed and/or magically in disguise.
I personally think that idea is ridiculous. It never crossed my mind. I think there is zero reason to suspect that, as there is no hint or rationale why that should be the case. Mario's faced other antagonists than Bowser, Link's clashed with other baddies than Ganon, and Kirby has tussled with more than just King Dedede. There isn't an army of Kremlings around, VoidCo seems like it must be a whole thing, so... no. Void Kong and K. Rool have to be separate. Why should it be bizarre that Nintendo, who have created all sorts of characters, still wants to generate more new characters?
If anything, if there are more Super Smash Bros. incoming, at the rate they're going, they're putting in more characters than they can create, so I would think they would take literally every opportunity to make new ones. I'm not saying that Void Kong, Poppy Kong, and Grumpy Kong necessarily have Smash Bros. potential... but heck, a Piranha Plant made it, so, anything's possible.
In the UNLIKELY case that Void Kong IS K. Rool or some previous character in disguise, we can all come back and laugh at me. But at this time, a few weeks before released, based on what we know, I would really bet on Void Kong being a totally new villain.